Radeon HD 2600 XT vs. GeForce 8600 GT

Written by Tim Smalley

August 14, 2007 | 12:01

Tags: #256mb #2600 #8600 #g84 #gddr3 #gddr4 #geforce #gt #hd #radeon #rv630 #xt

Companies: #amd #asus #ati #nvidia #sapphire

Supreme Commander

Publisher: THQ

We used the full retail version of Supreme Commander with the version 3223 patch applied. Supreme Commander is developed by Chris Taylor, the creator of the Total Annihilation series, and his development team, Gas Powered Games. Together, Taylor and his team have created what is widely regarded as the spiritual successor to one of the greatest RTS games of all time.

SupCom is a hugely tactical and strategic monster on a massive scale -- hundreds of units can appear on screen at once. It's a massive departure from anything else we've recently seen in the genre. It's one of (if not) the first RTS to allow the player to scroll out to view the scale of battle in its entirety.

We used the game's in-built performance test during our testing, as this provides over seven minutes of variable gameplay -- both zoomed in and out -- that should represent typical scenarios that a user is likely to encounter whilst playing the game. Due to the massive scale of the game, it's incredibly hard to accurately quantify performance in any other way. All in-game settings were set to medium.

Radeon HD 2600 XT vs. GeForce 8600 GT Supreme Commander

Supreme Commander

1024x768, 4xAA 16xAF, Medium Quality

  • Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1950 XT 256MB
  • Asus EN8600GT 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1950 Pro 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1650 XT 256MB
  • Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB GDDR4
  • Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 256MB
    • 41.9
    • 8.0
    • 37.4
    • 8.0
    • 36.0
    • 7.0
    • 34.5
    • 7.0
    • 31.9
    • 6.0
    • 29.2
    • 6.0
    • 27.6
    • 7.0
    • 26.2
    • 5.0
0
10
20
30
40
Frames Per Second
  • Average
  • Minimum

Supreme Commander

1280x1024, 4xAA 16xAF, Medium Quality

  • Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1950 XT 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1950 Pro 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS 256MB
  • Asus EN8600GT 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1650 XT 256MB
  • Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB GDDR4
  • Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 256MB
    • 33.9
    • 7.0
    • 33.2
    • 7.0
    • 27.9
    • 6.0
    • 25.1
    • 5.0
    • 24.6
    • 7.0
    • 20.4
    • 6.0
    • 20.3
    • 5.0
    • 19.3
    • 4.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Frames Per Second
  • Average
  • Minimum

Supreme Commander

1680x1050, 2xAA 16xAF, Medium Quality

  • ATI Radeon X1950 XT 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1950 Pro 256MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS 256MB
  • Asus EN8600GT 256MB
  • Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB GDDR4
  • Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 256MB
  • ATI Radeon X1650 XT 256MB
    • 30.6
    • 8.0
    • 29.5
    • 7.0
    • 26.5
    • 6.0
    • 23.9
    • 5.0
    • 20.4
    • 6.0
    • 18.5
    • 5.0
    • 18.1
    • 4.0
    • 18.0
    • 5.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Frames Per Second
  • Average
  • Minimum

The tables turn in Supreme Commander, as the Asus EN8600GT is faster than Sapphire's HD 2600 XT GDDR4 at all resolutions and settings tested here. We found the game playable at 1280x1024 4xAA 16xAF, but at 1680x1050, it was a little laggy for our tastes. With anti-aliasing disabled, we curiously found that performance suffered at 1680x1050... Yeah, we told you we'd had some strange happenings.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

TOP STORIES

SUGGESTED FOR YOU